PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026Reviews of Geophysics4 citations

Bayesian Inference for Subsurface Geophysical Inverse Problems

View Full Paper
MLMingliang LiuDGDario GranaKMKlaus Mosegaard

Key Points

  • This review explores Bayesian inference techniques for subsurface geophysical inverse problems, focusing on uncertainty quantification.
  • Syntheses of gradient-free and gradient-informed Bayesian inference techniques.
  • Coverage of applications in seismic, electromagnetic, gravity, and multiphysics inverse problems.
  • Analysis of deep learning's role in enhancing Bayesian inversion methods.
  • Demonstrated the effectiveness of Bayesian inference for integrating prior geological knowledge with observed data.
  • Highlighted advancements in gradient-informed methods for efficient exploration of parameter spaces.
  • Outlined the future potential of Differentiable Bayesian Inversion within geoscientific frameworks.

Abstract

Abstract In subsurface studies, geophysical inverse modeling aims to infer key Earth physical properties, such as deep geological structures, lithology, and fluid distribution from indirect observations, particularly geophysical data, while rigorously quantifying uncertainty. These inverse problems are typically high‐dimensional and computationally demanding, requiring efficient probabilistic inference methods. Bayesian inversion provides a coherent statistical framework that integrates prior geological knowledge with observed data, enabling systematic uncertainty quantification in subsurface characterization. Gradient‐free Bayesian sampling methods have long been used to characterize complex posterior distributions and remain foundational in geophysical inversion. Recently, in scenarios where gradient information can be efficiently obtained, gradient‐informed Bayesian inference methods have emerged as effective alternatives. By leveraging the local geometry of the posterior, these methods enable more efficient exploration of high‐dimensional parameter spaces. Concurrently, deep learning has further enhanced Bayesian inversion by facilitating implicit geological priors, surrogate forward modeling, and automatic differentiation for efficient gradient computation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of both gradient‐free and gradient‐informed Bayesian inference techniques, with an emphasis on the latter, and examines their applications in seismic, electromagnetic, gravity, and multiphysics inverse problems. Building on these developments, we introduce Differentiable Bayesian Inversion as a potential unifying conceptual framework that integrates deep‐learning‐based geological prior parameterization, physics‐based or surrogate forward modeling, and probabilistic reasoning within a modular, differentiable architecture. We conclude by outlining open challenges and future research directions toward developing robust, interpretable, and uncertainty‐aware inversion frameworks for increasingly complex geoscientific applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c08b9fa48f6b84677f92fahttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025rg000884
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Model-Driven and Data-Driven Inversion in Geophysical Exploration2026
  2. 2Stochastic full waveform inversion with deep generative prior for uncertainty quantification2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Streamlining Multi-Data Geophysical Inference with BayesBridge2024
  4. 42.5D Transient Electromagnetic Inversion Based on the Unstructured Quadrilateral Finite Element Method and a Geological Statistics-Driven Bayesian Framework2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Stochastic Inversion of Geophysical Data by Sequential Bayesian Updating Under a Non-Stationary Gaussian Process Prior2026