Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized controlled trial finds silver diamine fluoride more effective than fluoride varnish in arresting caries lesions in children’s molars.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and 5% fluoride varnish (FV) in arresting caries lesions in first permanent molars, considering their eruption status as a secondary clinical factor. A randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial was conducted with 165 children (6–12 years). A total of 660 first permanent molars were assessed; 139 teeth with ICDAS scores 1 or 2 were included for analysis. Participants were assigned via cluster randomization (school-level) to G1 (38% SDF + KI) or G2 (5% FV). Follow-up assessments were conducted after six months to evaluate caries arrest using ICDAS criteria. After six months, 88.1% of teeth in the SDF group (G1) reached an ICDAS score of 0, compared to 65.6% in the FV group (G2) (p < 0.001). The stage of molar eruption did not significantly influence the outcomes in either group (p = 0.99). Both treatments significantly reduced ICDAS scores from baseline (p < 0.001), but SDF demonstrated superior effectiveness. 38% SDF is more effective than 5% fluoride varnish in arresting early-stage occlusal caries lesions in first permanent molars, regardless of the eruption stage. SDF offers a highly effective, non-invasive, single-session alternative for managing early caries in permanent molars. Its efficacy is maintained even in partially erupted teeth, making it a practical tool for public health programs and pediatric clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: