Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The new sequent calculus improves grounding logic, suggesting links to an existing axiomatic system.
This paper investigates the logic of grounding, a non-causal explanatory relation. While the study of this field is flourishing, it is still in its early stages. This paper contributes to the literature by presenting GLWG G LWG , a novel sequent calculus for weak full grounding. While it provides a sequent-style presentation of the existing axiomatic system LWG LWG proposed by Adam Lovett, our calculus is balanced and avoids the ad-hoc rules contained in LWG LWG . An important fact shown in this paper is that if a sequent Γ ⇒ Δ Γ ⇒ Δ is derivable in GLWG G LWG , then any variable occurring positively (or negatively) in Γ Γ also occurs positively (or negatively) in Δ Δ . This highlights a deep connection between grounding and variable inclusion. This property, in particular, suggests a similarity to Rohan French’s sequent calculus for analytic containment, GAC G AC . Indeed, we demonstrate that GLWG G LWG is the negation dual of GAC G AC . The paper concludes by proving the equivalence between GLWG G LWG and LWG LWG .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shogo Tsuboi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: