Target trial emulation shows lower mortality and aspiration pneumonia risk in patients using GLP-1 RA versus DPP-4i after gastrostomy, suggesting improved safety.
Background: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients with type 2 diabetes following gastrostomy.Methods: We conducted a target trial emulation using real-world data.From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024, we identified 728 patients who initiated either GLP-1 RA or DPP-4i after gastrostomy.After 1:1 propensity score matching to balance baseline covariates, 364 patients were included in each group.The primary analysis followed an intention-to-treat principle, and follow-up continued until June 30, 2025.Several sensitivity analyses, including landmark analysis and E-value calculation, were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.Results: Compared with DPP-4i initiation, GLP-1 RA initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.93)and aspiration pneumonia (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93).Conclusions: Our findings indicate that initiation of GLP-1 RA, compared with initiation of DPP-4i, was associated with lower all-cause mortality and a lower risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients with type 2 diabetes following gastrostomy.Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings in this vulnerable population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tseng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: