Analyzes interfacial relative motion effects on joint strength in aluminum and carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastics, suggesting optimization is crucial for performance.
This study elucidates the influence of interfacial relative motion on joint formation and performance during ultrasonic bonding of an AA5182 Al alloy to carbon fiber (CF)/polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). The interfacial vibration behaviors and temperature histories were analyzed under various normal forces to clarify the heat generation mechanism. A critical transition in the dominant heat source was discovered: under 600 N, poor coupling causes intense relative motion at the sonotrode/Al interface (amplitude difference: 40 µm), resulting in a slow temperature rise. The bonding mechanism consists solely of resin adhesion. In contrast, 1200 N shifts this relative motion to the Al/CFRTP interface, triggering a rapid temperature rise to 370°C. CFs penetrate into the Al matrix and form a stronger bonding area. Joint strength analysis reveals that the joint strength (1250 N) is governed by three regions under a high normal force: a central mechanical interlocking region contributing 50% of the total strength, an annular cohesive failure region (30%), and an adhesive failure region (20%). These findings reveal that optimizing the interfacial relative motion behavior is essential for achieving high-performance metal–CFRTP dissimilar joints for lightweight automotive structures. • Analyzes the relative motion behavior between the bonding interface during ultrasonic bonding of aluminum alloys and carbon fiber – reinforced thermoplastics using a laser displacement measurement system. • Clarifies the effect of bonding conditions on the relative motion and joint strength. • Discusses the bonding mechanisms in different bonding regions and their contributions to joint strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: