PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026SSM - Qualitative Research in Health0 citationsOpen Access

From concealment to openness: navigating menstrual etiquette, stigma and shame

View Full Paper
LZLisa ZuidemaRadboud University NijmegenJLJaklien C. LeemansRadboud University NijmegenMBMarlies Y. BongersRadboud University Nijmegen

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand how societal norms around menstruation create stigma and influence individual practices.
  • Conducted in-depth narrative interviews with individuals who menstruate in the Netherlands
  • Explored experiences related to concealment, shame, and resistance during menstruation
  • Analyzed themes around menstrual etiquette and societal expectations
  • Menstrual stigma continues to drive the need for concealment and silence around menstruation
  • Participants reported feelings of shame and fear regarding visible signs of menstruation
  • Acts of openness were noted as subtle forms of resistance against social expectations
  • The findings expanded existing theories about menstrual concealment, showing complexities in lived experiences

Abstract

Menstruation is a natural biological process, yet it continues to be shaped by stigma, silence, and societal norms that contribute to feelings of shame and concealment. While research has highlighted the persistence of menstrual stigma, less is known about how individuals navigate the everyday pressures to hide or remain silent, and how these norms are resisted. This qualitative study draws on in-depth narrative interviews with Dutch people who menstruate to explore how societal expectations, menstrual etiquette, and the experiences of shame influence menstrual practices and perceptions. Participants described menstruation as something that should be hidden—physically, verbally, and emotionally. Social expectations were enforced through unspoken rules, interactions, and assumptions about what is appropriate. Participants spoke of managing menstruation discreetly, fearing visible signs such as leakage or being seen with menstrual products, and often feeling shame or embarrassment. At the same time, some described moments of openness and resistance, engaging in small but deliberate acts that challenged the concealment imperative when social contexts allowed. This tension between concealment and openness was central to how participants experienced and managed menstruation in daily life. By examining these lived experiences, the study extends theoretical work on the menstrual concealment imperative and highlights how stigma and shame are enacted and negotiated in practice. The findings suggest that while concealment remains dominant, everyday acts of openness and resistance reveal possibilities for shifting norms and fostering more open conversations about menstruation. • Menstrual stigma persists through social expectations of silence and concealment • Participants managed menstruation discreetly, fearing visible signs or judgement • Shame and etiquette shaped how participants spoke about and experienced menstruation • Moments of openness revealed subtle acts of resistance to concealment norms • Study extends the “menstrual concealment imperative” through lived experiences

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zuidema et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0e016fddb9876e79c1967https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100751
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper