This model explores how conditional belonging impacts identity, suggesting shifts in meaning can alleviate suffering.
The need for belonging is not merely another motivation or a simple desire; it is a survival strategy and the condition of possibility for the constitution of who we are. When belonging is experienced as conditional, the psychic structure ceases to organize itself around the expression of its specificities and begins to organize itself around its justification: the alibi. The alibi protects formal belonging — not being expelled, rejected, or excluded — but sacrifices real belonging: the possibility of being seen and received in one's singularity. The subject remains “within” the relationship, yet feels radically exiled. Relational Illegitimacy describes the state in which the subject, exiled from their own presence by shame, takes refuge in an idealized reality. This refuge is sustained only when meaning (subjective interpretation) replaces reality (the raw event) in lived experience, preventing direct access to life and the exercise of Authorship. This model proposes an ontology of experience aimed at displacing suffering from cognitive content to the structure of meaning, restoring to the subject the right to exist without prior justification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aluizio Barros da Silva Junior (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: