PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute6 citations

Impact of beta-blockers on prognostic outcomes in solid cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
SES EraslanEAEgemen AyhanMMMichael Tvilling Madsen

Key Result

Beta-blocker use in patients with solid cancers significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96) and progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.97).

Key Points

  • Evaluate the association between beta-blocker use and survival outcomes in patients with solid cancers.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched four databases for studies comparing beta-blocker users to non-users.
  • Included studies reporting on overall survival and other survival metrics in solid cancers.
  • Assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence through established tools.
  • Included 94 studies with 603,827 patients in the analysis.
  • Beta-blocker use showed significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.88).
  • Progression-free survival also improved with beta-blocker use (HR 0.82).
  • Greatest overall survival benefits were noted in gastrointestinal, lung, and skin cancer subtypes.

Structured PICO

Does beta-blocker use improve survival outcomes in patients with solid cancer?

P
Population
Patients with all stages of solid cancer
I
Intervention
Beta-blocker use
C
Comparator
Non-users of beta-blockers
O
Outcome
Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS)hard clinical

Beta-blocker use is associated with improved overall and progression-free survival in patients with solid cancers, particularly in gastrointestinal, lung, and skin cancers.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity
  • Observational nature of most included studies

Abstract

Abstract Background Beta-blockers are conventionally prescribed for cardiovascular indications and have potential for repurposing in oncology as adrenergic signalling promotes cancer progression. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether beta-blocker use is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with all stages of solid cancer. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using a predefined (PICO) framework. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched. Eligible studies compared beta-blocker users with non-users and reported survival outcomes in patients with solid cancer. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results A total of 5122 articles were screened; 94 articles were included in the systematic review and 84 in the meta-analysis comprising 603,827 patients. Beta-blocker use in patients with solid cancers was associated with significantly improved OS (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96) and PFS (HR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.69-0.97). The greatest effects on OS were observed in patients with gastrointestinal (HR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72-0.98), lung (HR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.71-0.99), and skin cancers (HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.73-0.89). Effects appeared stronger with post-diagnostic exposure and in certain cancer subtypes, however, heterogeneity and the observational nature of most included studies warrant cautious interpretation. Conclusion Beta-blocker use was associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with solid cancers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eraslan et al. (2026) studied this question. Beta-blocker use in patients with solid cancers significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96) and progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.97).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0e029fddb9876e79c1b8ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper