Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduce a threshold quantum distillation protocol that enables the extraction of perfect quantum correlations from multiple imperfect copies of a multipartite quantum state using only a subset of the parties ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>Q</a:mi> <a:mo><</a:mo> <a:mi>P</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> ) in the network. In particular, we show that for high-dimensional Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states, entanglement can be distilled by local filtering operations applied by just a single party, independent of the total number of parties in the network. In contrast, for the <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>W</b:mi> </b:mrow> </b:math> states, at least <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mi>P</c:mi> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:mn>1</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:math> parties are required for successful distillation, highlighting a strong connection between distillability and separability. We provide explicit protocols for threshold entanglement distillation and threshold steering distillation (TSD), and establish a direct link between the two: Any assemblage that can be distilled via TSD necessarily corresponds to a distillable entangled state. Our framework introduces a scalable and experimentally viable approach to distillation in quantum networks, with potential applications in distributed quantum computing, communication, and cryptography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anonymous et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: