This concept paper interrogates the intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI), epistemic equity, and language acquisition within marginalized communities. While contemporary scholarship often characterizes AI-mediated language learning (including automated feedback and large language models) as a democratizing force , this paper argues that such technologies risk reproducing colonial hierarchies by privileging high-resource languages and Western knowledge systems. The author identifies a significant theoretical gap: traditional L2 motivation frameworks—such as the L2 Motivational Self-System and Self-Determination Theory—frequently overlook the sociopolitical and historical dimensions of learning in post-conflict Indigenous contexts. Drawing on Fricker’s (2007) conceptualization of epistemic injustice and decolonial theory , the paper proposes a transformative research agenda. Key themes include: Critiquing the "testimonial" and "hermeneutical" injustices embedded in current AI training data. Reconceptualizing motivation as a political and epistemic phenomenon rather than a purely individual psychological construct. Advocating for the integration of Indigenous knowledge systems into the design of future AI-supported language environments. Ultimately, this work serves as a foundational call to center the epistemic participation of marginalized learners to ensure that the AI transition in education does not reinforce historical exclusion.
Carlito Pardillo (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: