PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2026Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology3 citations

Impact of Computer‐Aided Detection on Endoscopist's Gaze‐Shift Distance During Colonoscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial (With Video)

View Full Paper
SIShun ItoFIFumiaki IshibashiKOKosuke Okusa

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the impact of computer-aided detection on endoscopists' gaze-shift distances and eye strain during colonoscopy.
  • Conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial
  • Participants randomly assigned to CADe-first or conventional-first groups
  • Used a dedicated eye-tracking system to record gaze positions
  • Primary endpoint: gaze-shift distance in the first allocated group
  • Secondary endpoints: gaze-shift distance based on CADe experience and eye strain using a visual analog scale.
  • No significant difference in gaze-shift distance overall (30.7 vs. 32.7 pixels)
  • CADe-experienced endoscopists had shorter gaze-shift distance with CADe than conventional (25.9 vs. 29.4 pixels, p < 0.01)
  • No difference for CADe-inexperienced endoscopists (40.3 vs. 45.4 pixels, p = 0.463)
  • Lower visual analog scale score (3.2 vs. 4.6, p < 0.05) in CADe-first group.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Computer‐aided detection (CADe) facilitates colorectal lesion detection, but it remains unclear whether CADe affects endoscopist's eye strain by altering gaze patterns. This study aimed to determine whether CADe‐assisted colonoscopy is superior to conventional colonoscopy in reducing endoscopists' gaze‐shift distance. Methods This single‐center randomized controlled trial enrolled participants and randomly assigned them to two groups: first observation with CADe, then second observation without CADe (CADe‐first group) in the ascending colon, or observations in the reverse order (conventional‐first group). The endoscopist's gaze positions were recorded via a dedicated eye‐tracking system. The primary endpoint was the endoscopist's gaze‐shift distance within the first allocated group. The secondary endpoints were the gaze‐shift distance based on CADe experience and eye strain, ascertained using a visual analog scale (VAS) score. Results Among 59 patients that were assigned to two groups (CADe‐first, n = 30; conventional‐first, n = 29), there was no intergroup difference in the gaze‐shift distance (30.7 ± 10.7 pixels/30 ms vs. 32.7 ± 8.7 pixels/30 ms, p = 0.450). Among CADe‐experienced endoscopists, the distance was significantly shorter in the CADe‐first than in the conventional‐first group (25.9 ± 3.4 pixels/30 ms vs. 29.4 ± 3.6 pixels/30 ms, p < 0.01), whereas no difference was observed among CADe‐inexperienced endoscopists (40.3 ± 13.8 pixels/30 ms vs. 45.4 ± 11.1 pixels/30 ms, p = 0.463). The VAS score was significantly lower in the CADe‐first than in the conventional‐first group (3.2 ± 1.2 vs. 4.6 ± 1.5, p < 0.05). Conclusions CADe assistance did not significantly change the gaze‐shift distance overall, but it reduced gaze‐shift distance among CADe‐experienced endoscopists. Thus, CADe may be associated with reduced eye strain, depending on the endoscopist's CADe experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ito et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c2298daeb5a845df0d436fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70351
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper