PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

The explainability of radiomic-based machine learning models for brain glioma grading on amide proton transfer-weighted images

XGXuan GaoUnion HospitalJWJing WangSichuan Agricultural University

Key Points

  • The study evaluates the explainability of machine learning models for grading gliomas using radiomic features derived from APTw images.
  • Analyzed APTw images from 102 preoperative MR examinations of glioma patients.
  • Extracted radiomic features from both contrast-enhanced and peritumoral edematous regions.
  • Trained machine learning models, including random forest, support vector machine, naïve bayes classifier, and logistic regression.
  • Used explainability algorithms like Shapley values and permutation importance to analyze model performance.
  • Model explainability revealed that performance relied on specific radiomic features.
  • Grading models effectively distinguished between grade 4 gliomas and non-grade 4 gliomas.
  • Heterogeneity in radiologic phenotypes was crucial for successful glioma grading.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate radiomic-based machine learning models for glioma grading on amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) images using explainability algorithms. A total of 102 patients who underwent preoperative MR examinations, including FLAIR, T1-weighted, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced, and APTw images, were included. Two groups of APTw images were analyzed: one corresponding to contrast-enhanced regions of gliomas and the other corresponding to both contrast-enhanced and peritumoral edematous regions of gliomas. Radiomic features were extracted from these regions. Random forest, support vector machine, naïve bayes classifier, and logistic regression models were trained to distinguish grade 4 from non-grade 4 gliomas. These models were analyzed by Shapley values, permutation importance, and the method of anchors. The results of model explainability analysis revealed that the grading performance of these models relied on radiomic features highlighting the heterogeneity of radiologic phenotypes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37aa8b34aaaeb1a67c913https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44963-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities2020 · 485 citations
  2. 2Anchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations2018 · 2,130 citations
  3. 3Utilizing the amide proton transfer technique to characterize diffuse gliomas based on the WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumors2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and derived radiomics in the classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas2023 · 34 citations
  5. 5Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype2017 · 6,726 citations