PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Genes2 citationsOpen Access

Performance of the ForenSeqTM Imagen Kit for Forensic DNA Phenotyping Under Partial Genotyping Conditions

View Full Paper
NGNayeli González-OrtizMGMariano Guardado-EstradaNZNahum Zepeta-Flores

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of the ForenSeq Imagen kit for DNA phenotyping under partial genotyping conditions.
  • Analyzed 94 DNA samples from a Mexican mestizo population using the ForenSeq Imagen kit.
  • Selected 41 samples with more than 60% locus detection for further analysis.
  • Conducted phenotype predictions using the HIrisPlex-S model and performed ancestry inference through principal component analysis.
  • Executed in silico simulations to assess the effects of locus-specific dropout.
  • Eye color prediction had reduced feasibility (68.3%) and accuracy (56.1%).
  • Hair and skin color inference was feasible in over 97% and 100% of samples, respectively, with moderate accuracy (70% for hair, 61% for skin).
  • Ancestry inference was reliable with at least 27 aiSNPs detected, while Y-SNPs accurately distinguished male and female samples.
  • The critical role of rs12913832 in eye color prediction was confirmed by in silico analyses.

Abstract

Background: Forensic DNA phenotyping (FDP) enables the inference of externally visible characteristics (EVCs) and biogeographic ancestry when conventional STR profiling is inconclusive. The ForenSeq™ Imagen kit (107 SNPs) integrates phenotype-, ancestry-, and Y-SNPs markers; however, its performance under partial genotyping conditions has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: Ninety-four samples from a Mexican mestizo population were analyzed using the ForenSeq™ Imagen kit on the MiSeq FGx™ platform. Due to incomplete genotype recovery, 41 samples with >60% locus detection were selected for downstream analyses. Phenotype prediction was performed using the HIrisPlex-S model, and ancestry inference was assessed through principal component analysis. In silico simulations were conducted to evaluate locus-specific dropout effects. Results: Eye color prediction showed both reduced feasibility (68.3%) and lower overall accuracy (56.1%), primarily driven by systematic prediction failure when rs12913832 (HERC2) was absent, although accuracy among successfully predicted samples remained high (82.1%). In contrast, hair and skin color inference remained feasible in >97% and 100% of evaluable samples, respectively; however, classification accuracy was moderate (70% for hair and 61% for skin), improving substantially when allowing adjacent-category concordance (90.2% for skin). Ancestry inference was robust when at least 27 aiSNPs were detected, and Y-SNPs reliably distinguished male and female samples. In silico analyses confirmed the critical contribution of rs12913832 to eye color model operability. Conclusions: FDP performance under partial genotyping reflects a trade-off between prediction feasibility and accuracy and depends on locus-specific integrity rather than overall genotype completeness. The ForenSeq™ Imagen kit shows robustness for ancestry, sex, hair, and skin prediction, although with variable accuracy, whereas eye color inference remains structurally vulnerable to drop out of high-impact variants. Evaluating FDP systems under realistic non-ideal conditions is essential to define their true operational limits and ensure scientifically robust and responsible implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

González-Ortiz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37adcb34aaaeb1a67cbb1https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17030354
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper