Background: X-linked immunodeficiency with magnesium defect, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection, and neoplasia (XMEN) disease is a rare inborn error of immunity caused by loss-of-function mutations in MAGT1, leading to impaired N-linked glycosylation. Although chronic EBV viremia is a hallmark of XMEN disease, the mechanisms underlying its marked clinical heterogeneity remain poorly understood. Methods: We performed an in-depth clinical, immunological, and genetic characterization of two siblings carrying a pathogenic MAGT1 variant (c.369_370insCC; p.Gly124fs), validated and deposited in ClinVar (SCV007293792). Assessments included whole-exome sequencing, multiparametric flow cytometry focusing on NKG2D expression, and longitudinal clinical follow-up. Results: Despite shared absence of NKG2D expression, the siblings exhibited strikingly divergent phenotypes. One sibling developed progressive neurodegeneration with central nervous system atrophy. The other presented with a complex immuno-hematologic phenotype, including EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphoma, recurrent autoimmune cytopenias, and lymphoma-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, representing a novel clinical association in XMEN disease. Comparative immunophenotyping revealed shared defects in B-cell maturation but distinct T-cell differentiation patterns. To contextualize neurological variability, we propose a descriptive, hypothesis-generating three-category conceptual classification comprising early-onset neurodevelopmental forms, adult-onset neurodegenerative manifestations, and secondary immune-mediated or vascular involvement of the nervous system. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate profound intrafamilial heterogeneity in XMEN disease and suggest a model in which modifier-sensitive factors influence organ-specific disease expression. The observation of lymphoma-associated thrombotic microangiopathy and the proposed descriptive neurological classification provide a conceptual framework that may help guide tailored, multidisciplinary surveillance beyond the primary genetic defect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kural et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: