Key result
Normal troponin testing links to ~19 percentage points higher hospital admission in low-to-intermediate-risk ED patients.
Why the study?
Expanding use of cardiac troponin testing may increase resource utilization in low-risk emergency department populations.
Does routine cardiac troponin testing in lower-risk emergency department patients improve short-term clinical outcomes compared to selective or no testing?
Cohort (n=727,772)
Yes
Does routine cardiac troponin testing in lower-risk emergency department patients improve short-term clinical outcomes compared to selective or no testing?
Indiscriminate cardiac troponin testing in low- and intermediate-risk emergency department patients increases resource utilization without improving short-term clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for targeted testing protocols.
Routine troponin testing in lower-risk patients may drive low-value care;.
Background: Cardiac troponin testing is central to evaluating suspected acute coronary syndromes, yet its expanding use may increase resource utilization in low-risk emergency department populations. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across three tertiary hospitals in South Korea (2017–2023) using harmonized electronic health record data integrated with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM) and the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS). Visits were stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk by age and chest pain presentation, and cardiac troponin T was categorized as normal (<0.014 ng/mL), borderline (0.014–0.052 ng/mL), or elevated (>0.052 ng/mL). Outcomes included emergency department length of stay, hospital admission, 30-day revisit, 30-day coronary revascularization, and 30-day mortality. Results: Among 727,772 visits, troponin testing increased from 29.8% in 2017 to 45.5% in 2023. High-risk patients were consistently tested, whereas testing rose substantially in intermediate- and low-risk groups. In high-risk patients, normal troponin values were associated with lower 30-day revascularization and mortality, without prolonging length of stay or increasing admissions. In contrast, in lower-risk groups, testing was associated with longer stays and higher admissions without clear short-term clinical benefit. Conclusions: These findings support more targeted troponin testing protocols to optimize emergency department resource use while preserving diagnostic performance in higher-risk presentations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department (n=727,772). Cardiac troponin testing vs. No cardiac troponin testing was evaluated on Hospital admission rate (normal cTnT vs untested group) (p=<0.01). Cardiac troponin testing rates increased from 29.8% to 45.5% between 2017 and 2023; in low- and intermediate-risk patients, normal troponin results were paradoxically associated with longer emergency department stays and higher admission rates without clear short-term clinical benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: