Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel cocrystals of trimethylglycine and halogenated phenols demonstrate unique intermolecular interactions, suggesting new design strategies.
Two novel cocrystals of zwitterionic trimethylglycine (TMG) with 2,6-dichlorophenol [TMG•2,6-dichlorophenol] (1:1) and 2,6-dibromophenol [TMG•2,6-dibromophenol] (1:2) are synthesized and structurally characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction. To estimate the energy of various intermolecular interactions, periodic DFT calculations were performed followed by Bader analysis of the crystalline electron density. TMG molecules form dimers in [TMG•2,6-dichlorophenol] (1:1). Its supramolecular structure is governed by the primary charge-assisted H-bonds (~60 kJ/mol) and supported by C–H∙∙∙O contacts (~12 kJ/mol). Cl/Br substitution introduces a more potent halogen-bonding donor. The Br∙∙∙O− interaction (~10 kJ/mol) is strong enough to reorganize the packing into a catemeric motif. As a result, TMG molecules form infinite chains in [TMG•2,6-dibromophenol] (1:2). This illustrates that “fine tuning” is not merely about changing distances, but about shifting the entire energy hierarchy of the crystal. Two-dimensional fingerprint diagrams (2D diagrams) obtained from the Hirshfeld surface and Bader’s analysis of the crystalline electron density give significantly different values of the contributions of the H∙∙∙H contacts, 28% vs. 5% respectively. The main reason for this discrepancy is the large number of relatively short intermolecular H∙∙∙H contacts without a critical bond point in trimethylglycine cocrystals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Churakov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: