PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Molecules2 citationsOpen Access

Tuning Supramolecular Structure in Trimethylglycine Cocrystals: Competition Between Hydrogen and Halogen Bonding upon Cl/Br Substitution

View Full Paper
ACA. V. ChurakovAMAlexander G. MedvedevASAnastasia V. Shishkina

Key Points

  • This research investigates how halogen bonding and hydrogen bonding interact in trimethylglycine cocrystals.
  • Synthesized trimethylglycine cocrystals with 2,6-dichlorophenol and 2,6-dibromophenol.
  • Characterized structures using single crystal X-ray diffraction.
  • Performed periodic DFT calculations to estimate intermolecular interaction energies.
  • Conducted Bader analysis on crystalline electron density.
  • Trimethylglycine forms dimers in the dichlorophenol cocrystal primarily through hydrogen bonds.
  • Bromine substitution introduces stronger halogen bonds, leading to infinite chains in the dibromophenol cocrystal.
  • Significant discrepancies exist in the contributions of H∙∙∙H contacts between two-dimensional fingerprint diagrams and Bader's analysis.

Abstract

Two novel cocrystals of zwitterionic trimethylglycine (TMG) with 2,6-dichlorophenol TMG•2,6-dichlorophenol (1:1) and 2,6-dibromophenol TMG•2,6-dibromophenol (1:2) are synthesized and structurally characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction. To estimate the energy of various intermolecular interactions, periodic DFT calculations were performed followed by Bader analysis of the crystalline electron density. TMG molecules form dimers in TMG•2,6-dichlorophenol (1:1). Its supramolecular structure is governed by the primary charge-assisted H-bonds (~60 kJ/mol) and supported by C–H∙∙∙O contacts (~12 kJ/mol). Cl/Br substitution introduces a more potent halogen-bonding donor. The Br∙∙∙O− interaction (~10 kJ/mol) is strong enough to reorganize the packing into a catemeric motif. As a result, TMG molecules form infinite chains in TMG•2,6-dibromophenol (1:2). This illustrates that “fine tuning” is not merely about changing distances, but about shifting the entire energy hierarchy of the crystal. Two-dimensional fingerprint diagrams (2D diagrams) obtained from the Hirshfeld surface and Bader’s analysis of the crystalline electron density give significantly different values of the contributions of the H∙∙∙H contacts, 28% vs. 5% respectively. The main reason for this discrepancy is the large number of relatively short intermolecular H∙∙∙H contacts without a critical bond point in trimethylglycine cocrystals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Churakov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b33b34aaaeb1a67d5edhttps://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31061047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper