Analysis benchmarks renewable energy use in V4 against EU average, suggesting tailored strategies.
This study benchmarks renewable energy source (RES) utilization in the Visegrad Four (V4) against the EU average using Eurostat data for 2014–2022. A multi-layer framework was used to combine technology-specific per-capita indicators, sectoral RES shares, cluster analysis, and panel regression with fixed effects. The EU substantially exceeds V4 in hydropower (774.06 vs. 270.19 kWh/person), wind (972.06 vs. 161.30 kWh/person), and solar technologies. The electricity-sector gap is most pronounced (EU 41.17% vs. V4 18.69%). Paired t-tests confirmed a statistically significant persistent gap (t(8) = −20.78; p < 0.001), consistent with delayed convergence. Cluster analysis assigned all V4 countries to a single moderate-RES tier, structurally separated from Western and Nordic clusters; panel regression confirmed that the V4 coefficient was robustly negative (β = −5.783 to −9.088 pp) even after policy controls, with fossil lock-in (β = −2.404 pp) emerging as the most consistent structural determinant, whereas V4 × fossil lock-in interaction was positive (β = +2.558 pp), suggesting partial mitigation through differentiated pathways. Intra-V4 heterogeneity—Slovakia’s hydropower lock-in, Hungary’s wind prohibition, Poland’s coal dependency, and Czech Republic’s curtailed feed-in tariff—argues against homogeneous policy responses; results support technology-specific strategies (wind/solar PV in Poland/Czech Republic; solar thermal/heat pumps in Hungary/Slovakia) and grid modernisation as cross-cutting priority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mykhei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: