PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Fluid dynamics & materials processing2 citationsOpen Access

Rheology of Paste in Mine Backfilling: Mechanisms, Models, and Key Influencing Factors

MZMingzhi ZhangQZQian ZhangHZHaonan Zhang

Key Points

  • The central aim is to synthesize current knowledge on paste rheology in mine backfilling systems and to identify key influencing factors.
  • Reviewed existing literature on paste rheology and empirical models
  • Analyzed various rheological parameters under different conditions
  • Critically examined the applicability of Bingham and Herschel–Bulkley models
  • Discussed factors like particle gradation, temperature, and chemical additives
  • Identified limitations of existing models in capturing complex rheological behavior
  • Highlighted the importance of linking microstructural mechanisms to macroscopic response
  • Proposed physics-constrained data-driven approaches for improved prediction of rheological behavior

Abstract

The rheological behavior of paste in mine backfilling systems is governed by multiple coupled mechanisms, including particulate structure evolution, time-dependent effects, spatially heterogeneous flow, and scale dependence. As a result, its macroscopic response cannot be adequately described by a single material parameter or purely local constitutive relations. Although significant progress has been made in experimental characterization and empirical modeling, rheological parameters reported under different conditions remain difficult to reconcile, highlighting the limitations of existing models in capturing structural evolution and nonlocal effects. This review provides a concise synthesis of current advances in paste rheology for mine backfilling applications, with emphasis on yield behavior, shear-rate-dependent nonlinear flow response, thixotropy, and shear history effects. The applicability and limitations of commonly used rheological models, including the Bingham and Herschel–Bulkley models, are critically examined. Key factors influencing paste rheology—such as particle gradation, temperature, and chemical additives—are discussed from a structure-controlled perspective. Finally, physics-constrained data-driven approaches are highlighted as a promising direction for improving the description and prediction of complex rheological behavior. Overall, this review emphasizes the need to balance experimental observability, model simplicity, and physical consistency, and highlights the importance of linking microstructural mechanisms, scale effects, and macroscopic rheological response to establish more unified and engineering-relevant frameworks for paste rheology in mine backfilling systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b41b34aaaeb1a67d79chttps://doi.org/10.32604/fdmp.2026.078178
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Numerical simulation of the layered filling process of cemented paste backfill based on thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical coupling analysis2026
  2. 2Flow Characteristics of Unclassified Tailings Backfill Slurry and Optimization of Roof-Contact Backfilling Scheme2026
  3. 3Rheological Characterization of Tailing Pastes from Ore Mining2026
  4. 4Features of Modeling the Mechanical Response of Crushed Salt-Based Backfill Material in Potash Mines2026
  5. 5Experimental Investigations and Development of a Comprehensive Rheological Model for Cement Paste: A Novel Integration of Thixotropic Behavior and Hydration Effects2026