PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Ear and Hearing3 citationsOpen Access

Pediatric CI 3-60 Guideline: When to Refer Children for a Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation

View Full Paper
JHJourdan T. HolderAWAndrea D. Warner-CzyzLPLisa R. Park

Key Points

  • To establish a guideline for referring children for cochlear implant candidacy evaluation based on specific criteria.
  • Developed a three-faceted referral guideline for CI evaluation: unaided 4FPTA, aided SII, and WRS.
  • Incorporated evidence-informed decision-making to address age-related testing limitations.
  • Aligned pediatric guidelines with adult CI candidacy criteria for consistency.
  • Guidelines capture a significant portion of children likely to benefit more from CIs than hearing aids.
  • CIs are framed as part of a continuum of hearing technology for children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
  • Age-related behavioral testing limitations were acknowledged and addressed in the evaluation process.

Abstract

Pediatric CI candidacy considerations require a holistic approach that incorporates evidence-informed decision-making to accommodate age-related limitations in behavioral testing. These data-driven recommendations support a three-faceted referral guideline for CI evaluation, called CI 3-60: unaided 4FPTA ≥60 dB HL, aided SII ≤0.60, or WRS ≤60% correct (when available) in the ear to be implanted. This pediatric referral recommendation is consistent with current adult CI candidacy evaluation referral guidelines but adds consideration of aided SII to compensate for pediatric limitations in completing open-set speech recognition tasks. While not all children referred for an evaluation ultimately undergo implantation, these guidelines (a) capture a high proportion who would benefit more from a CI than hearing aids, and (b) frame CIs as part of a continuum of hearing technology for children who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holder et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b74b34aaaeb1a67ddd3https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001812
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper