This review explores autosomal expression bias impacting genetic disease penetrance, suggesting new frameworks for understanding genetics.
Humans are disomic. At birth, all nucleated cells in the body have the same genetic material, composed of 22 pairs of autosomes and a pair of sex chromosomes. Half the chromosomes are maternal, and half are paternal. It is thought that the two copies of autosomal genes are equally transcribed and translated in a given cell. This notion, based on Mendelian genetics, has guided the identification of genetic variants capable of causing disease for a century. These variants have been classified as displaying dominant or recessive inheritance. The term "penetrance" was coined to explain why some individuals carrying disease-causing variants do not develop the disease. Differences in penetrance are often assumed to be due to largely unproven effects of the environment, polygenic effects, and/or mosaicism. More recently, autosomal random monoallelic expression (aRMAE)-a phenomenon in which one of the two parental alleles of a gene is more strongly or exclusively expressed in some, but not all, cells-has been put forward to account for the incomplete penetrance observed in a growing number of genetic conditions. Here, we review aRMAE from historical, biochemical, genetic, epigenetic, and disease-influencing perspectives and propose a new framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dusan Bogunovic (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: