This manuscript redefines magnetism and resolves paradoxes in astrophysical models, suggesting new insights into charge currents.
Classical electrodynamics and astrophysical models often encounter mathematical singularities at extreme mass densities or current flows. This manuscript redefines magnetism within a discrete spacetime framework, establishing it not as a standalone force, but as an informational shear stress induced upon a Cartesian matrix. By operating at a strict spatial resolution limit of i=10⁻⁴, the research provides a mechanical resolution to long-standing paradoxes in field theory and high-energy astrophysics. Key Scientific Contributions Systemic Magnetic Induction (SMI): Organically derives a universal outward push constant of -0.1356 using Mohr's circle dynamics. Active vs. Passive Magnetism: Delineates the mechanical distinction between kinetic information flow (currents/rotation) and static atomic locks (permanent magnets). Informational Thermodynamics: Redefines temperature as informational noise and introduces the 'Aks' (A) unit to prove that the Curie temperature is a phase-lock dissolution event rather than a purely kinetic transition. Aks-Spike Mechanics: Establishes an absolute transverse shear limit of τₘₐₓ ≈ 0.64 to resolve the infinite-field paradox of magnetars. Relativistic Jets: Mathematically derives a precise 64.06° structural angle for the ejection of un-renderable mass data (the Aks-Spike), providing a geometric alternative to the Blandford-Znajek mechanism. Mathematical Bridge The paper includes a formal derivation showing that classical continuous calculus (such as Ampere’s Law) is a macro-approximation of this discrete grid-based summation. It demonstrates that by introducing a hard mathematical stop at Rₘᵢₙ = i, physical singularities are eliminated without violating observable empirical data. Keywords Discrete Spacetime, Systemic Magnetic Induction (SMI), Mohr’s Circle Dynamics, Aks-Spike, Informational Thermodynamics, Magnetar Paradox, Anadihilo Framework, Singularities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nitin Dagar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: