PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Dairy0 citationsOpen Access

The Mitigation of Methane Emissions from Ruminants: Evaluating the Efficacy of Selected Additives and Feed Replacements in an In Vitro Trial

View Full Paper
ANAna Maria da Costa Goncalves NoronhaObihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary MedicineEAEslam AhmedSouth Valley UniversityAMAhmed O. Matti-AlapafujaObihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine

Key Points

  • The study assesses the effectiveness of various feed additives and replacements in reducing methane emissions from dairy cattle.
  • Conducted an in vitro batch culture study for 24 hours.
  • Tested microalgae, macroalgae, and grape marc as feed additives or replacements.
  • Evaluated inclusion levels of 5%, 30%, 50%, and 70% in a basal diet of Klein grass hay and concentrate mixture.
  • Grape marc reduced methane yield by about 43.3% when used as a feed additive.
  • Higher replacement levels of microalgae and grape marc (50% and 70%) reduced methane but also gas and volatile fatty acid production.
  • At a 30% replacement level, microalgae and grape marc showed promising efficiency without significantly affecting fermentation.

Abstract

The need for new feed ingredients that could reduce methane (CH4) emissions from dairy cattle while maintaining rumen function is essential for sustainable milk production. This study aimed to evaluate the CH4 mitigation potential of selected microalgae and macroalgae, along with an agro-industrial by-product, using two feeding strategies, and hypothesized that lipid- and polyphenol-rich materials would reduce CH4 production in an inclusion-dependent manner. An in vitro batch culture study (24 h) was conducted to evaluate microalgae (Euglena gracilis and Aurantiochytrium spp.), macroalgae (Undaria pinnatifida), and an agro-industrial by-product (grape marc) either as feed additives (5%) or as a partial replacement of the concentrate mixture (30%, 50%, and 70%) in a basal diet consisting of 50% Klein grass hay and 50% concentrate mixture. As a feed additive, grape marc stands out for its potential to reduce CH4 yield by about 43.3% without adversely affecting digestibility, pH, or total volatile fatty acid concentrations. When used as feed replacements, Euglena-, Aurantiochytrium-, and grape marc-based feeds reduced CH4 yield at the highest replacement levels (50 and 70%); however, these effects were accompanied by decreased total gas production and volatile fatty acid concentrations, indicating reduced fermentation activity. Meanwhile, at a 30% replacement level, they showed promising efficiency as alternative feeds. Overall, CH4 mitigation depends more strongly on inclusion strategy rather than feed type. Lipid-rich microalgae showed potential as concentrate replacements up to 30%, whereas grape marc was most effective as a feed additive for reducing CH4 emissions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Noronha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37ba2b34aaaeb1a67e39fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/dairy7020025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper