PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Sports Medicine4 citationsOpen Access

One Step Further: Integrating Evidence-Based Guidelines into Practice to Address Environmental Challenges at the Men’s 2026 FIFA World Cup

CEChris J. EshLoughborough UniversitySCSarah CarterVictoria UniversityVBValérie BougaultUniversity of British Columbia

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a framework for teams to implement evidence-based strategies addressing environmental stressors during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
  • Review of environmental challenges faced during the tournament.
  • Analysis of existing evidence-based guidelines for sports medicine.
  • Framework development for practical implementation by teams.
  • Identification of unique environmental stressors like heat and pollution.
  • Recommendations for strategies to optimize player health.
  • Framework designed to ensure practical application of guidelines during the tournament.

Abstract

Abstract The Men’s 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup (Canada, Mexico and the USA) will expose teams to an unprecedented combination of environmental challenges (heat, altitude, air pollution, allergens and travel). Conditions will vary significantly between host cities, creating a significant threat to player health and performance. These unique stressors may require teams to adopt and adapt strategies to best protect player health and performance. A related open access Sports Medicine review outlines these environmental challenges and the evidence-based guidelines to prepare for and mitigate their effects. Motivation for the present review stems from the unique practical and logistical complexities of ‘tournament football’—especially at the expanded 2026 FIFA World Cup—alongside the limitations of previous football-facing reviews, where ‘evidence-informed practice’ is often not underpinned by football-specific research and thus limits external/ecological validity. Building on the recommendations of the main review, this partner review focuses on integrating those guidelines into practice. It aims to provide teams with a practice-compatible framework to implement evidence-based strategies to protect player health and optimise performance at the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Esh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37bb3b34aaaeb1a67e4d8https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-026-02415-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lower Running Performance and Exacerbated Fatigue in Soccer Played at 1600 m2014 · 54 citations
  2. 2Mechanisms of haemoglobin mass expansion following heat stress2025 · 10 citations
  3. 3Are “classical” tests of repeated-sprint ability in football externally valid? A new approach to determine in-game sprinting behaviour in elite football players2015 · 89 citations
  4. 4Reliability and Validity of the CORE Sensor to Assess Core Body Temperature during Cycling Exercise2021 · 83 citations
  5. 5Effects of Repeated-Sprint Training in Hypoxia on Sea-Level Performance: A Meta-Analysis2017 · 201 citations