Demonstrates improved overall survival in patients terminating immunosuppression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, suggesting better clinical outcomes.
The clinical impact of immunosuppression termination (IST) after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains to be fully elucidated. This study was aimed at assessing the impact of IST within 2 years after transplantation on subsequent clinical outcomes. We analysed data for patients from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 (TRUMP 2) database who survived without progression for at least 2 years after allo-HSCT. Of the 5061 patients whose median age was 48 (range: 0-79) years, 2320 discontinued immunosuppressive therapy within 2 years (IST group), while 2741 did not (non-IST group). The 4-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly higher in the IST group than in the non-IST group (95.3% vs. 90.8%; p < 0.01). The 4-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower in the IST group than in the non-IST group (3.5% vs. 8.6%; p < 0.01). This reduction in NRM was consistent across major causes, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-related mortality, infection-related mortality and organ failure-related mortality. Immunosuppressive therapy beyond 2 years after allo-HSCT was associated with inferior OS. Our findings suggest that the optimal transplant strategy is necessary to avoid long-term immunosuppression for improving clinical outcomes in allo-HSCT recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: