PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Asian Journal of PhilosophyOpen Access

On theological contradiction: responses to d’Agostini, Casati & Fujikawa, DeVito, Gómez Gutiérrez, Joaquin & DeVito, and Reese

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JBJc Beall

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Replies clarify the role of glut-theoretic frameworks in understanding contradictions in Christian theology.

Key Points

  • To respond to questions about the role of logic in understanding theological contradictions in Christian belief.
  • Engaged with multiple symposium papers discussing philosophical aspects of theology.
  • Focused on glut-and gap-theoretic logical accounts of contradictions in Christian thought.
  • Analyzed the interactions between logical frameworks and theological claims.
  • Highlighted that theology can be rich and contradictory while being modeled by sparse logic.
  • Stressed the independence of each section within the replies, reinforcing a common theme of logical simplicity.

Cite This Study

Jc Beall (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37c33b34aaaeb1a67ef88https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00389-w
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trinity, simplicity, and contradictory theology: a theologian's reflections2024
  2. 2On Hegel and the continental tradition: responses to Estrada-González, Ficara, and Shores2026
  3. 3Toward an East–West Ultramontane Polyphony: On Dogma, Ecclesial Unity, and the Filioque2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Two in one: contradictory Christology without gluts?2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5The Law of Non-contradiction and Global Philosophy of Religion2024 · 2 citations