Some philosophers of science—myself included—appeal to fiction as an interpretation of the practice of modeling. This raises the specter of an incompatibility with realism, since fiction making is essentially nontruth regulated. I argue that the prima facie conflict can be resolved in two ways, each involving a distinct notion of fiction and a corresponding formulation of realism. The main goal of the essay is to describe these two packages. I comment also on how to choose between them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnon Levy (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: