Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article challenges Tony Lawson’s claim (Lawson, 2016) that his ontology of money as the ‘social positioning’ of ‘prior value’ is more sustainable than prominent existing theories and is able therefore to reconcile their putative incompatibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geoffrey Ingham (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: