Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 26, 2026

Arbitrability and Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration: National Exceptions and Their Consequences

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DBDmitry Semenovich Belkin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

The article examines arbitration legality in various jurisdictions, indicating the need for clear clauses in contracts.

Key Points

  • The article aims to analyze the impact of national exceptions on the enforcement of arbitration agreements in international commercial disputes.
  • Examined the legal framework of arbitration agreements
  • Analysed national exclusions from arbitrability
  • Discussed party autonomy versus judicial powers
  • Assessed the role of institutional rules in disputes
  • Identified a permissive role for courts in arbitration
  • Highlighted the significance of public policy and arbitrability
  • Found that the law of the seat and enforcing state influence arbitration outcomes
  • Outlined a balance between freedom of contract and public-law intervention

Cite This Study

Dmitry Semenovich Belkin (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cc02fdc3bde4489174cdhttps://doi.org/10.64457/ru-science-2014-i03-a03
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Party Autonomy vs. Judicial Intervention: A Doctrinal Analysis of Arbitration Regime2025
  2. 2ARBITRABILITY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES2026
  3. 3The Paradox of Public Policy in Nigerian Arbitration: A Protective Principle or Judicial Loophole?2026
  4. 4Rethinking Arbitrator Immunity: The Role of Party-Arbitrator Agreements2026
  5. 5Supranational Sources in Arbitration Proceedings: Conditions of Admissibility, Procedural Safeguards, and Enforceability of Awards2019 · 11 citations