Evaluates ecosystem services in coastal ecosystems, revealing priorities for sustainable management amid climate risks.
Coastal ecosystems in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve face increasing pressure to reconcile economic development with environmental protection, creating a need to prioritize ecosystem services for local management under climate related risks and livelihood transitions. This study evaluates sixteen ecosystem services by applying an integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework. To address uncertainty in expert judgment, the potential-flow-demand criteria are combined with generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (GTrFNs) and the centroid index ranking method. The results reveal a precaution-oriented prioritization pattern in which regulatory services, particularly Control of extreme events and Climate regulation, receive the highest priority, reflecting a shared consensus that ecological resilience constitutes an essential foundation for the local economy. Cultural services related to leisure and tourism occupy an intermediate position characterized by a complex trade-off, where economic potential is balanced against environmental safeguards. In contrast, the invariant low ranking of provisioning services confirms a definitive forest transition where local stakeholders have permanently shifted away from direct extraction models. These findings support ecosystem service-based management approaches that emphasize safeguarding regulatory functions and reinvesting tourism related benefits into conservation to enhance the long-term resilience of forest coastal systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: