PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology1 citationsOpen Access

The late-onset of veno-occlusive disease after liver transplantation is associated with poorer graft survival

View Full Paper
SMSebagh MylèneYFYilmaz FundaSFSaliba Faouzi

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effects of late-onset veno-occlusive disease on graft survival in liver transplant patients.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of liver transplant recipients with histologically-confirmed VOD from 2014 to 2021.
  • Considered factors affecting graft survival and the relationship with AMR in VOD patients.
  • Classified VOD cases as early-onset and late-onset to assess prognostic differences.
  • Identified VOD in 39 out of 1,471 liver transplant recipients, with a median onset time of 12.6 months.
  • Late-onset VOD (>5 years post-transplant) associated with an increased risk of graft loss (P=0.002).
  • The probability of graft loss was found to be 50% at 4.5 years post-VOD diagnosis.

Abstract

• Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after liver transplantation mostly described through case reports has uncertain prognostic significance. This large single-center study demonstrates the deleterious impact of the late-onset of VOD on graft survival. The presence of antibody-mediated rejection particularly in late-onset VOD patients is intriguing and requires further investigation. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after liver transplantation mostly described through case reports has uncertain prognostic significance. We aim to determine factors that influence graft survival, and explore the presence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) recently reported in this pathological condition. This single-center study included liver transplant recipients with histologically-confirmed VOD between 2014 and 2021. Retrospective analysis of clinicopathological data was primarily focused on their impact on prognosis then compared between AMR/VOD and non-AMR/VOD patients. VOD identified in 39/1471 (2.6%) recipients occurred at a median time of 12.6 months (range: 0.3-328.3 months), most cases (79.5%) within the first 5 years and 20.5% beyond 15 years post-transplant. The probability of graft loss was 50% at 4.5 years post-diagnosis. Donor and recipient age, symptoms at presentation, history of rejection, and treatment provided had no impact on graft survival. Late-onset VOD (> 5 years post-transplant) was associated with a higher risk of graft loss ( P =0.002). AMR preceded VOD in three patients and developed afterward in two. Patients with AMR were younger age at liver transplantation ( P =0.013) and at time of VOD diagnosis ( P =0.006), had higher DSA positivity, were of later-onset VOD ( P =0.001) and more often underwent retransplantation ( P =0.001). There were no significant differences in the sinusoid/centrilobular vein C4d positivity between AMR/VOD and non-AMR/VOD cases. We introduced a novel classification of post-transplant VOD cases into early-onset and late-onset, the latter having a poorer prognosis and being more often associated with AMR. The relationship between VOD and AMR requires further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mylène et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cc85fdc3bde448917e71https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2026.102811
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper