PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery3 citationsOpen Access

A subgroup analysis of perioperative pembrolizumab in clinical stage II non–small-cell lung cancer from the randomized keynote-671 study

View Full Paper
MTMasahiro TsuboiHWHeather WakeleeMGM Garassino

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with stage II non-small-cell lung cancer.
  • Participants with stage II–IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.
  • Treatment included pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and additional adjuvant treatment.
  • Exploratory analyses focused on outcomes specifically for participants with clinical stage II disease.
  • Of the 797 participants, 239 had stage II disease, with a significant number in both treatment groups.
  • 94.9% R0 resection rate in the pembrolizumab group compared to 86.4% in the chemotherapy-only group.
  • Event-free survival improved with a hazard ratio of 0.50 and overall survival with a hazard ratio of 0.69 in the pembrolizumab arm.
  • Higher rates of major and pathological complete responses were observed in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group.

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Perioperative pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved outcomes versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in early-stage, resectable, non–small-cell lung cancer in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-671 study. We report outcomes in participants with baseline clinical stage II disease. METHODS Participants with untreated, resectable, stage II–IIIB (N2) non–small-cell lung cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for 13 cycles (⁓9 months). Exploratory analyses were performed in participants with clinical stage II disease. RESULTS Of 797 randomized participants, 239 had stage II disease (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 118; chemotherapy only, n = 121). Median study follow-up at data cutoff (August 19, 2024) was 49.9 (range, 32.2–75.3) months. Among participants who underwent surgery, 94/99 (94.9%) had R0 resections in the pembrolizumab arm and 89/103 (86.4%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy only arm. Event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34–0.74), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.43–1.11), major pathological response (difference, 25.7%; 95% CI, 15.3–35.9), and pathological complete response (difference, 21.3%; 95% CI, 13.2–30.2) were improved in the pembrolizumab arm. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 50.0% of participants treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.5% with chemotherapy; no treatment-related adverse events led to death. CONCLUSIONS In participants with stage II non–small-cell lung cancer, perioperative pembrolizumab improved efficacy outcomes with manageable safety versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, consistent with the overall KEYNOTE-671 population. These results support the use of this regimen in patients with stage II disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsuboi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccd6fdc3bde448918660https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezag028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper