PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Journal of Documentation2 citations

Knowledge graphs generation from cultural heritage texts: combining LLMs and ontological engineering for scholarly debates

View Full Paper
ASAndrea SchimmentiVPValentina PasqualFVFabio Vitali

Key Points

  • To develop a methodology for systematic knowledge extraction from cultural heritage texts into structured knowledge graphs.
  • Developed the ATR4CH methodology with five steps: analysis, annotation schema, pipeline architecture, integration refinement, evaluation.
  • Used annotation models and ontological frameworks alongside large language models for knowledge extraction.
  • Implemented a sequential pipeline with three LLMs for extracting information from Wikipedia articles.
  • Achieved an F1 score of 0.96–0.99 for metadata extraction.
  • Obtained an F1 score of 0.7–0.8 for entity recognition.
  • Reached an F1 score of 0.65–0.75 for hypothesis extraction.
  • Scored 0.95–0.97 for evidence extraction and 0.62 G-EVAL for discourse representation.

Abstract

Purpose Cultural heritage (CH) texts contain rich knowledge that is difficult to query systematically due to the challenges of converting unstructured discourse into structured knowledge graphs (KGs). This paper introduces ATR4CH (Adaptive Text-to-RDF for Cultural Heritage), a systematic five-step methodology for Large Language Model (LLM)-based knowledge extraction from CH documents. We validate the methodology through a case study on authenticity assessment debates. Design/methodology/approach ATR4CH combines annotation models, ontological frameworks and LLM-based extraction through iterative development: foundational analysis, annotation schema development, pipeline architecture, integration refinement and comprehensive evaluation. We demonstrate the approach using Wikipedia articles about disputed items (documents, artifacts, etc.), implementing a sequential pipeline with three LLMs (Claude Sonnet 3.7, Llama 3.3 70B and GPT-4o-mini). Findings The methodology successfully extracts complex CH knowledge: 0.96–0.99 F1 for metadata extraction, 0.7–0.8 F1 for entity recognition, 0.65–0.75 F1 for hypothesis extraction, 0.95–0.97 for evidence extraction and 0.62 G-EVAL for discourse representation. Smaller models performed competitively, enabling cost-effective deployment. Research limitations/implications The produced KG is limited to Wikipedia articles. While the results are encouraging, human oversight is necessary during post-processing. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic methodology for coordinating LLM-based extraction with CH ontologies. ATR4CH provides a replicable framework adaptable across CH domains and institutional resources. ATR4CH enables CH institutions to systematically convert textual knowledge into queryable KGs, supporting automated metadata enrichment and knowledge discovery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schimmenti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccf7fdc3bde448918b40https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2025-0203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Heritage Building Information Management and Intelligent Querying by Multimodal Large Language Models and Knowledge Graph2025
  2. 2Natural Language as an Interface for Structured Knowledge2026
  3. 3Knowledge engineering with LLMs for asset information management in the built environment2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Construction of multimodal knowledge graph for cultural heritage: enhanced joint extraction and domain-adaptive cross-modal alignment method2026
  5. 5Automated Knowledge Extraction from Large Language Model Research Papers for the ORKG Model Landscape2026