This retrospective study compares ASCT and CAR-T therapy outcomes in CNS lymphoma, suggesting ASCT may be more effective.
Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT) is a reasonable consolidation therapy for eligible patients with chemosensitive relapsed central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) who have achieved complete remission (CR) and maintained the CR. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with relapsed CNSL, although evidence on outcomes in patients who achieve CR is limited. To compare the efficacy of ASCT versus CAR-T therapy as consolidation therapy in patients with relapsed CNSL once CR had been re-achieved. A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent ASCT or CAR-T therapy at the Department of Lymphoma, Beijing Gobroad Hospital, between 2021 and 2024. CAR-T therapy was part of the clinical trial “Different B-cell-targeted CAR-T cells for relapsed/refractory CNSL (ChiCTR2200058972)”. Sixty patients, including 42 (70%) with primary CNSL and 18 (30%) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with secondary CNS involvement, were enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 12.1 months (1.28–59.9 months). Compared with patients in the CAR-T group, patients who received ASCT while in CR had superior progression-free survival (PFS) [3-year PFS 80% (95% CI: 48.4–93.4) vs. 64.8% (95% CI: 38.9–81.9); P = 0.026] and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression [3-year relapse rate 20% (95% CI: 4.12–44.39) vs. 30.2% (95% CI: 11.0–52.2); P = 0.038]. Compared with CAR-T therapy, ASCT was associated with improved PFS in patients with relapsed CNSL who had achieved CR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: