A retrospective cohort study evaluates bleeding risks with eptifibatide in stroke patients, indicating key predictive factors.
Introduction: Antiplatelet therapy is essential for stent patency in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving internal carotid artery stents. Half-dose eptifibatide is used for emergent stenting in severe presentations. This study evaluates the bleeding risk associated with eptifibatide+dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus DAPT and introduces a clinical risk score for radiographic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods: This single center, retrospective cohort study (June 2017–June 2024) included adults with AIS who underwent internal carotid artery stenting and received eptifibatide+DAPT versus DAPT alone. The primary outcome was symptomatic ICH (NIHSS worsening > 4). Due to low event rates, radiographic ICH was used for multivariable modeling. Secondary endpoints included 30-day ischemic stroke, in-hospital mortality, and stent restenosis. A ridge-penalized logistic regression was used to identify predictors of radiographic ICH and develop a risk score. Results: Among 176 patients, 52 received eptifibatide+DAPT and 124 patients received DAPT. Eptifibatide was administered for a median of 18.2 hours. The eptifibatide+DAPT group had higher stroke severity (NIHSS 14.4 vs 9.3, p< 0.001), underwent thrombectomy more often (69% vs 27%), and had a greater frequency of high-grade stenosis (62% vs 33%). Symptomatic ICH was rare and not significantly different between groups (1.9% vs 4.0%, p=0.804). Radiographic ICH occurred more frequently with eptifibatide (38.5% vs 12.9%, p< 0.001) and provided sufficient events for multivariable analysis. Ridge regression identified eptifibatide use (OR ~3.2) and NIHSS (OR ~2.3 per point) as the strongest predictors of radiographic ICH, followed by stenosis >90% and diabetes. A point-based score was derived: 2 points for NIHSS ≥15, 2 for eptifibatide use, 1 for diabetes, and 1 for high-grade stenosis. Patients with scores of 0–1 had ~5% risk of radiographic ICH, compared to 45% in those scoring ≥3. Conclusions: Eptifibatide was associated with increased radiographic but not symptomatic ICH. This bleeding risk appeared linked to higher stroke severity and more urgent intervention in the eptifibatide+DAPT group. A risk score may help guide individualized antiplatelet decisions during emergent carotid stenting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: