Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Colenso’s commentary illustrates early critiques of Judaism and the influence of African contexts on theology, suggesting new implications for modern discussions on race and religion.
John William Colenso’s Commentary on Romans, written during his time as Bishop of Natal and published in 1861, remains neglected in the field of New Testament studies, as does Colenso’s work more generally, despite some notable recent attention. The commentary is, however, of considerable interest. It displays some significant similarities with the much later New Perspective on Paul, and offers an early example of a participationist reading of Paul, seen through the lens of Colenso’s inclusive and universalist theology. It also shares some of the problems of the New Perspective, particularly in terms of its critique of Judaism. The commentary is also significant and relevant to current debates about decolonisation, because of the ways in which the African context shaped Colenso’s reading of the letter and because of the powerful critique of (English) ethnic and (Christian) religious superiority that Colenso finds in Romans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David G. Horrell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: