Animal study demonstrates protective effects of NAC, carvedilol, and paricalcitol in peritoneal fibrosis, suggesting potential for new treatments.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the potential protective effects of paricalcitol, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and carvedilol in a rat model of chlorhexidine gluconate–induced peritoneal fibrosis.Material and Methods: Thirty-six female Wistar albino rats were randomized into six groups (n=6 each). Peritoneal fibrosis was induced with daily intraperitoneal chlorhexidine gluconate injections for 21 days. Treatment groups received paricalcitol, NAC, or carvedilol, alone or in combination. Serum TGF-β1 levels and histopathological parameters (peritoneal thickness, fibrosis, inflammation, vascularization) were assessed.Results: Serum TGF-β1 was significantly higher in the chlorhexidine group compared to controls (58.29 ± 4.40 vs. 49.06 ± 2.35 ng/mL, p<0.05). NAC significantly reduced TGF-β1 compared to chlorhexidine alone (46.76 ± 4.79 ng/mL, p<0.05). Peritoneal thickness was markedly increased in the chlorhexidine group (245 ± 27.3 µm vs. 22.3 ± 2.6 µm in controls, p<0.01) but attenuated by NAC (169.8 ± 30.8 µm, p<0.01) and carvedilol (146.5 ± 43.1 µm, p<0.01). Fibrosis and inflammation scores were also reduced in NAC and carvedilol groups (all p<0.05). Paricalcitol alone showed only partial and non-significant effects.Conclusions: NAC demonstrated consistent antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects, while carvedilol provided moderate benefit and paricalcitol had limited efficacy. These findings suggest that antioxidant therapy, particularly NAC, may represent a potential strategy for preserving peritoneal membrane integrity, though further studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Öneç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: