This paper asks the most fundamental question in affective science: *What ARE emotions, exactly?* We synthesize six major theoretical traditions—the Symmetry Theory of Valence (STV), Lisa Feldman Barrett's Theory of Constructed Emotion (TCE), Karl Friston's Free Energy Principle (FEP), Tozzi and Meijer's topological/geometric brain models, Jaak Panksepp's Affective Neuroscience, and Antonio Damasio's Somatic Marker Hypothesis—into a unified account through the lens of the Mycelial Information Model (MIM). We propose that emotions are **geometrically constrained information shells** where outer geometry (the "shape" of the emotional state) constrains and organizes inner data (the content of experience), while phenomenality sits at the hierarchical apex but is processed horizontally through metacognitive and cognitive channels. This MIM-Geometric Theory of Emotion (MGTE) resolves the apparent contradictions between constructionist, nativist, and formalist approaches by showing they describe different levels of the same hierarchical structure.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brandon Charles Emerick
Swiss Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Swiss Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brandon Charles Emerick (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cd73fdc3bde448919d29 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19207420
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: