Uncovers structural relations between mass and size in galaxies, suggesting evolutionary pathways among them.
The baryonic mass–size relation of galaxies links the total baryonic mass (stars plus gas) to the baryonic half-mass radius. In the first paper of this series, we showed that star-forming galaxies from the SPARC sample follow two distinct relations in the baryonic mass–size plane: one defined by high-surface-density (HSD), star-dominated, Sa-to-Sc galaxies, and one defined by low-surface-density (LSD), gas-dominated, Sd-to-dI galaxies. In this second paper, we study the structural relations between baryonic mass, half-mass radius, and mean surface density to constrain possible morphological transformations between star-forming and passive galaxies. We complemented the SPARC sample with ∼1200 passive galaxies that are nearly devoid of gas: ellipticals (Es), lenticulars (S0s), dwarf ellipticals (dEs) or dwarf spheroidals (dSphs), and the so-called ‘ultra-diffuse galaxies’ (UDGs). Our results can be summarised as follows: (1) passive stellar components follow four distinct relations at high statistical significance, namely (i) Es plus bulges, (ii) S0 disks, (iii) non-nucleated dwarfs (dEs, dSphs, and UDGs), and (iv) nucleated dEs. (2) Star-forming HSD disks (mostly Sa to Sc) overlap with S0 disks within 2σ in the baryonic relations and within 1σ in the stellar ones, so present-day spirals may simply evolve into S0s as they run out of gas. (3) Star-forming LSD disks (mostly Sd to dI) are offset from non-nucleated passive dwarfs by more than 3σ in the baryonic relations, but the two galaxy populations overlap within 1σ in the stellar relations, suggesting that non-nucleated passive dwarfs can form from star-forming dwarfs only after gas removal. (4) UDGs extend the sequence of non-nucleated dEs/dSphs and may originate from the most diffuse star-forming LSD galaxies with no need for a substantial expansion of the stellar component.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hua et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: