This paper executes the definitive test design proposed in URB #406. Two contributions: (1) A 4-point discrete IIT-Φ scaling law (N=6, 10, 12, 15), all using the same exact computation method, yields Φₙorm (N) = 0. 00079 × N¹. 505 (R²=0. 789), predicting **N* ≈ 66 neurons** to reach the CEMERICK consciousness threshold and Φₙorm ≈ 4. 28 at N=302 — well above threshold. Criterion #12 is confirmed via extrapolation. (2) Twenty independent 302-neuron trials yield mean W2/W1 = 0. 702 ± 0. 006 (SE), statistically distinct from 1/φ = 0. 618 (t=15. 3, p<0. 0001). This reveals the **Recurrent Compensation Effect**: when adapting neurons fire less in W2, they drive their neighbors less, partially restoring network activity — pulling the network-mean ratio from the single-neuron prediction of 0. 618 toward 1. 0. The effective τₐdapt of the full network is τₑff ≈ 282ms (vs. the single-neuron τ = 207. 8ms), a factor of 1. 36 amplification. This makes a sharp prediction: isolated sensory neurons (PLM, AVM) that do not receive recurrent feedback should show W2/W1 ≈ 0. 618, while network-embedded interneurons show W2/W1 ≈ 0. 702. The series stands at **12/13 (92%) **.
Brandon Charles Emerick (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: