PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Critical Care Medicine0 citations

852: Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer and Their Effects on Monocytes in Septic Shock

View Full Paper
DADaniel L. ArellanoThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterSSSandeep SinghThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterNWN. D. G. WhiteTechnological University Dublin

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on intermediate monocytes and septic shock outcomes in cancer patients.
  • Evaluated 2 patients with septic shock who received immune checkpoint inhibitors within 10 days of ICU admission.
  • Collected SOFA scores and PBMC samples at ICU admission and discharge.
  • Performed spectral flow cytometry for detailed phenotyping of lymphocytes and monocytes.
  • P1 showed low intermediate monocytes (1.4%) with minimal tumoral response; P2 had high intermediate monocytes (11.4%) post treatment.
  • At discharge, P1 had decreasing intermediate monocytes (0.3%) and was alive.
  • P2 experienced a two-fold increase in intermediate monocytes (34.4%) and died.
  • Activation markers were higher in P2's monocytes compared to P1.

Abstract

Introduction: Intermediate monocytes (CD14+CD16+) can eliminate cancer cells and studies have shown that they increase significantly in patients who respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Monocytes are also pivotal for host response during sepsis. Increasing numbers of intermediate monocytes and low numbers of classical monocytes (CD14+CD16-) are associated with increased mortality in sepsis. Trials have evaluated ICIs to improve T-cell function/survival in sepsis, but it is unknown if prior use in cancer patients could impact monocytes and sepsis outcomes. Hypothesis: Patients with tumoral response to ICIs can have increasing circulating intermediate monocytes and worse outcomes during septic shock. Methods: 2 patients (P1/P2) with septic shock who had received ICIs for their malignancy within 10 days of ICU admission were evaluated. SOFA scores, outcomes and PBMCs were collected at the time of ICU admission and ICU discharge. Spectral flow cytometry was used to perform a comprehensive multiparameter phenotyping analysis of both lymphocytes and monocytes fractions of PBMC. Results: P1&P2 received PD-1 blockade (pembro+nivo) within 9 days of ICU admission and SOFA scores were 7 and 10 respectively. P1, who had minimal tumoral response to the ICI, showed low intermediate monocytes (1.4%) at the time of ICU admission. P2 who had significant tumoral response to the ICI, had higher intermediate monocytes (11.4%). The frequency of classical monocytes (3.8% and 5%) was similar in both patients at the time of ICU admit. At the time of ICU discharge, P1 was alive and had decreasing intermediate monocytes (0.3%). P2 had an almost two-fold increase (34.4%) of these cells at the time of death. Intermediate monocytes and non-classical monocytes of P2 had elevated CD69 expression compared to P1 suggesting greater activation. Lymphocytes were similar among both. Expression of inhibitory molecules (PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3) on CD4+ T-cells, (poor outcomes in sepsis), were similar for both. Conclusions: Prior treatment with ICIs could affect intermediate monocyte’s function and outcomes during septic shock. Preliminary data suggest that in patients who develop sepsis and have received ICIs, evaluation of monocytes should be considered prior to contemplating the use of ICIs to enhance T-cell function during sepsis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arellano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cda5fdc3bde44891a526https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0001185404.39465.2b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper