This analysis evaluates surface position constraints in black holes, suggesting implications for astrophysical measurements.
Constrains the CCEGA reflective surface position ε in Kerr geometry by evaluating two physically motivated models. Model B (entropy-suppressed surface, ε ~ exp(-S_BH/2)) gives Δf → 0 — undetectable — because S_BH ~ 10^78 for stellar-mass black holes makes ε effectively zero. Model A (Planck-scale surface, ε = l_Pl/r_+) gives Δf ~ 10–100 Hz within the Einstein Telescope band. The spin-dependent correction to ln(1/ε) from the variation of r_+ with a* is less than 1% across the full spin range, confirming that the ratio table of Paper 22 is robust to better than 1%. The derivation of ε from the modulus field equation of motion in Kerr geometry is identified as the central open problem of the CCEGA black hole sector. All numbers independently verified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marc López Sánchez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: