PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Patient Education and Counseling1 citationsOpen Access

Comparing online and onsite communication training: effects of social presence, performance, and acceptance in a randomized field trial

View Full Paper
AGArtemisa GogollariFSFelix SchmitzKSKai Schnabel

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effects of online versus face-to-face communication training on medical students' performance and perceptions of social presence.
  • Randomized between-subjects trial with 140 fourth-year medical students
  • Participants assigned to either online or face-to-face training
  • Training involved motivational-interviewing scenarios
  • Social presence measured using the SoPr-scale
  • Communication performance assessed with BECCI and BGR scales
  • Higher social presence reported in face-to-face training compared to online
  • No significant differences in communication performance between both formats
  • 99% of students and all SPs preferred face-to-face interactions
  • Online training demonstrated equivalent performance despite lower social presence

Abstract

Effective doctor-patient communication is crucial for patient health outcomes, emotional well-being, and overall satisfaction. In undergraduate medical education, such skills are often taught through simulated patient (SP) interactions. With the acceleration of digital learning and teaching (DLT) during the COVID-19 pandemic, new flexible opportunities have emerged. However, questions remain about the quality of the communication experience, particularly the perceived social presence in online settings. A randomized between-subjects trial was conducted with 140 fourth-year medical students attending a mandatory communication course at the University of Bern, Switzerland. All participants completed identical preparatory learning materials before being randomly assigned to either online or face-to-face communication training with SPs. Both groups engaged in motivational-interviewing scenarios. Students’ and SPs perceptions of social presence were measured using the newly developed SoPr-scale . Communication performance was assessed by trained raters using the Behaviour Change Counselling Index (BECCI) for MI and the Berlin Global Rating (BGR) scale for general communication quality. SPs and students also rated their acceptance of the training modality. Both students and SPs in face-to-face condition reported significantly higher social presence compared with the online condition. Communication performance, however, did not differ significantly between groups. Notably, 99% of students and all SPs preferred face-to-face interactions. Although online training produced communication performance equivalent to face-to-face training, perceived social presence and preference strongly favored in-person delivery. These findings underscore the persistent challenge of fostering interpersonal connection in DLT environments despite technological progress. While online communication training can achieve comparable performance outcomes, enhancing social presence remains essential for (e.g.) sustaining engagement and satisfaction in medical DLT environments. Blended learning designs combining online preparation with onsite practice, and targeted efforts to enhance social presence, are recommended to optimize engagement and learning effectiveness. • Online and face-to-face training showed equivalent communication performance • Social presence was significantly higher in face-to-face encounters • Online training is a valid, flexible, and resource-efficient alternative • Enhancing social presence is key to improving digital communication learning

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gogollari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdb6fdc3bde44891a706https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2026.109603
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Online vs. face-to-face interactive communication education using video materials among healthcare college students: a pilot non-randomized controlled study2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Swiss medical schools’ experiences with online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic in light of international experiences2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Experiential learning: Transforming theory into practice2012 · 589 citations
  4. 4A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research2016 · 29,126 citations
  5. 5Home Care for Cancer Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Double Triage Protocol2020 · 76 citations