Retrospective study compares outcomes of drug-coated balloons and plain angioplasty in hemodialysis patients, suggesting similar efficacy.
Objective To descriptively compare the clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCB) and plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) in hemodialysis patients with Below-The-Knee (BTK) peripheral artery disease. Methods This retrospective study included 96 hemodialysis patients (DCB:55 POBA:41). Outcomes included changes in Rutherford grade, wound healing, freedom from target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), survival, and amputation-free survival. Results Both groups demonstrated improvement in Rutherford grade at 12 months. Wound healing occurred in 60.6% (95% CI 42.1–76.8) of the DCB group and 50.0% (95% CI 32.0–67.9) of the POBA group. Amputation-free survival was 72.7% (95% CI 59.0–83.0) with DCB and 67.7% (95% CI 52.5–80.0) with POBA. Freedom from CD-TLR was 78.9% (95% CI 65.0–88.5) for DCB and 91.6% (95% CI 79.0–97.0) for POBA. No clear between-group differences were observed. Conclusion No significant differences were observed between DCB and POBA in this small retrospective cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: