PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026European Annals of Dental Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Detection of Dental Restorations in Digital Panoramic Radiographs Using YOLOv11

FAFulya AydınŞAŞükran AyranMYM. Kaan Yüce

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the YOLOv11 model in detecting dental restorations on digital panoramic radiographs.
  • Used 320 panoramic radiographs from adult patients.
  • Annotated four types of dental restorations: amalgam, composite, crown, and bridge.
  • Divided data into training (75%) and testing (25%) subsets.
  • Assessed model performance with precision, recall, F1-score, and mAP metrics.
  • The YOLOv11 model achieved a precision of 0.663, recall of 0.665, and F1-score of 0.663.
  • Mean Average Precision (mAP) was 0.671 at IoU@50 and 0.432 at IoU@50–95.
  • Performance varied among different types of dental restorations.

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the YOLOv11 deep learning–based object detection model in detecting dental restorations on digital panoramic radiographs.Materials and MethodsA total of 320 panoramic radiographs obtained from adult patients were included in this study. Four types of dental restorations—amalgam, composite, crown, and bridge—were manually annotated and used for model training and evaluation. The dataset was divided into training and testing subsets at a ratio of 75% and 25%, respectively. A validation subset was derived from the training data. Model performance was assessed using precision, recall, F1-score, and mean Average Precision (mAP) metrics.ResultsThe YOLOv11 model achieved an overall precision of 0.663, recall of 0.665, and F1-score of 0.663 across all restoration categories. The mAP@50 value was 0.671, while the mAP@50–95 value was 0.432, indicating variations in detection performance across different Intersection over Union thresholds. Differences in detection performance were observed among the various types of dental restorations.ConclusionThe findings indicate that YOLOv11 demonstrates measurable potential as an automated support tool for detecting dental restorations on panoramic radiographs; however, the achieved performance remains lower than that reported in several previous studies. Successful clinical integration of such AI-assisted systems requires further optimization and validation using larger and more heterogeneous datasets to enhance generalizability and clinical applicability.Keywords: deep learning; dental restorations; panoramic radiography; YOLOv11

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aydın et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61ff615a0a509bde18516https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2026.0007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Automated assessment of periapical health based on the radiographic periapical index using YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and YOLOv12 one-stage object detection algorithms2025 · 8 citations
  2. 2Detection of Dental Anomalies in Digital Panoramic Images Using YOLO: A Next Generation Approach Based on Single Stage Detection Models2025 · 9 citations
  3. 3Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of YOLOv11, YOLOv10, YOLOv9, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 on Object Detection of Power Equipment2025 · 35 citations
  4. 4A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms2016 · 405 citations
  5. 5AI-based automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial anatomy from CBCT scans for automatic detection of pharyngeal airway evaluations in OSA patients2022 · 59 citations