PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026JCO oncology advances.2 citationsOpen Access

Alliance A221805: Duloxetine to Prevent Oxaliplatin-Induced Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study

View Full Paper
ESEllen M. Lavoie SmithMLMinji K. LeeMSMary R Scott

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in preventing sensory nerve damage caused by oxaliplatin in patients with colorectal cancer.
  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design
  • Participants received either 30 mg or 60 mg duloxetine or placebo daily
  • Participants diagnosed with stage II to III colorectal cancer
  • Primary endpoint measured sensory OIPN symptoms after treatment
  • No significant difference in responders between placebo (68.0%) and duloxetine (30 mg: 65.2%, 60 mg: 66.0%)
  • Low adherence rates for duloxetine at less than 75%
  • A total of 143 out of 199 participants were evaluable for the primary endpoint analysis

Abstract

PURPOSE The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A221805) was to screen two doses of duloxetine for preventing sensory oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). METHODS Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once daily 30 mg duloxetine, 60 mg duloxetine, or placebo. Eligible participants had stage II to III colorectal cancer and no baseline neuropathy, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, were age 25 years and older, and received oxaliplatin via one of the following doses and schedules: 85 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks (6 or 12 doses) or 130 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks (4 doses). Duloxetine/placebo was taken once daily beginning day 1 of cycle 1 and continued for 17 weeks. The primary end point, a composite response reflecting sensory OIPN symptom severity and onset, was measured in weeks 19-21 using a validated participant-reported outcome survey assessing extremity numbness, tingling, and pain. Response was defined as a participant-reported highest score of ≤2 (ie, 1 = not at all; 2 = a little) on survey items. To be evaluable for the response end point, eligible participants must have initiated oxaliplatin and submitted ≥1 postbaseline OIPN survey. RESULTS Of the 199 participants (n = 66, 30 mg duloxetine; n = 66, 60 mg duloxetine; n = 67, placebo), 46, 47, and 50 (N = 143, 71.8%), respectively, were evaluable for primary end point analysis based on modified intention-to-treat criteria. Participant mean age was 55.1 years (standard deviation = 10.4). Most were White (n = 113, 80.7%) and male (n = 82, 58.6%). The proportion of responders among those receiving placebo (68.0%) was similar to those receiving duloxetine 30 mg (65.2%) or 60 mg (66.0%). Duloxetine adherence rates, measured via pill counts—30 mg (54%), 60 mg (57%), and placebo (59%) groups—were low (<75%). CONCLUSION Duloxetine is not more promising than placebo for preventing sensory OIPN.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c6201515a0a509bde18812https://doi.org/10.1200/oa-25-00107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper