This research develops a prediction framework for schedule delays in construction, suggesting improved risk management strategies.
Purpose This study proposes a hybrid linear–nonlinear regression framework for early-stage prediction of construction schedule delay by integrating environmental indicators with Earned Value Management (EVM) metrics during the first 20% of project duration. Design/methodology/approach Environmental variables (temperature, rainfall, humidity, wind speed and mSPI) were combined with EVM indicators (PV, EV, AC, SPI and CPI) to predict the schedule delay ratio (SDR). Seventy-eight weekly observations from three building projects were analysed. A multiple linear regression (MLR) model was integrated with nonlinear models (Decision Tree and XGBoost) using an optimised fixed-weight fusion strategy. Time-ordered validation, cross-validation and sensitivity analysis were employed to ensure robustness. Findings The hybrid model achieved a 20–50% reduction in RMSE compared with standalone models and demonstrated improved residual stability and lower prediction variance. Rainfall and mSPI were identified as dominant early-stage predictors, while SPI and CPI provided complementary managerial insight. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the nonlinear amplification of adverse climatic effects. Research limitations/implications The study is based on three region-specific projects and a limited dataset; results should be interpreted as proof-of-concept evidence. Practical implications The framework enables early warning of delay risk, facilitating proactive resource allocation and schedule intervention. Social implications Improved delay prediction supports timely project delivery, reducing cost overruns, resource wastage and environmental impacts, while enhancing workforce stability and stakeholder confidence. Originality/value This study introduces a parsimonious fixed-weight linear–nonlinear fusion framework tailored for small-sample, early-stage construction data. By jointly modelling environmental variability and EVM indicators, the research enhances predictive accuracy while maintaining interpretability, supporting proactive schedule risk management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: