PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Australian Journal of Rural Health0 citationsOpen Access

Stakeholder Perspectives on Ear and Hearing Health Service Provision for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children

View Full Paper
JSJacqueline H. StephensBPBrianna PoirierAMAmanda Machell

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand stakeholder perspectives on ear and hearing health service provision for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders via teleconference
  • Explored opinions on current screening processes and AHWP engagement
  • Identified themes regarding workforce capacity and community awareness
  • Identified themes included fragmented systems and confusion around scope of practice
  • Emphasized the need for stronger workforce capacity and improved service utilization
  • Highlighted community education as vital for raising awareness about ear health impacts

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Ear disease and hearing loss are largely preventable; however, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children experience some of the highest rates globally. National and state guidelines recommend involving Aboriginal Health Workers/Practitioners (AHWP) in ear and hearing screening, but no investigation has been conducted into stakeholder perspectives on their role. Setting, Participants and Design Key stakeholders involved in ear and hearing screening participated in semi‐structured interviews via teleconference to explore their views on current screening processes, AHWP engagement and strategies for improvement. Results Thirteen stakeholders participated. Five themes were identified: (i) a fragmented, short‐sighted and inconsistent system; (ii) confusion around scope of practice; (iii) workforce capacity; (iv) community awareness and knowledge and (v) service provision and utilisation. Strategies for improvement included strengthening workforce capacity, implementing a family friendly approach (e.g., no age limits), dedicated ear health champions to facilitate timely and appropriate follow‐up and the potential role for technology in the ear health pathway. Stakeholders also advocated for the need for community education to raise awareness of the impacts of poor ear and hearing health. Conclusions This study describes the current state of ear and hearing health services for Aboriginal children and provides insights into improving ear and hearing screening programmes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stephens et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c6209315a0a509bde1920ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.70167
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cost‐effectiveness of School Hearing Screening Programs: A Scoping Review2020 · 30 citations
  2. 2Developmental risk among Aboriginal children living in urban areas in Australia: the Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health (SEARCH)2020 · 20 citations
  3. 3‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’ Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews2012 · 504 citations
  4. 4Colonisation – It’s bad for your health: The context of Aboriginal health2013 · 383 citations
  5. 5Management of children with otitis media: A summary of evidence from recent systematic reviews2009 · 32 citations