An experimental investigation shows how Al2O3 and CeO2 enhance combustion and emissions in diesel and biodiesel.
This study evaluates the effects of Al2O3 and CeO2 nanoparticles as additives to standard diesel and biodiesel fuels on the combustion and emissions characteristics of a CR diesel engine with split injection (pilot and main injections). Three nanoparticle dosing levels (50 ppm, 100 ppm, and 150 ppm) were compared with undoped standard diesel and biodiesel fuels. The results showed that the presence of both Al2O3 and CeO2 in biodiesel increased the ignition delay of the pilot fuel by about 8.0% at low load and about 3.5% at high load. The addition of both nanoparticles to diesel and biodiesel fuels had an insignificant effect on the main injection fuel’s ignition delay, MBF50 position and combustion duration. The thermal efficiency was up to 1.0% lower. Al2O3 additive in diesel had no significant effect on NOx emissions. CO emissions were higher by 4.4–7.5% in most cases. The Al2O3 additive in biodiesel reduced NOx emissions by an average of 38%, 17.1%, and 9.4% at low, medium, and high engine loads, respectively. The reduction in CO emissions averaged 15%. The addition of CeO2 nanoparticles to diesel fuel reduced NOx emissions by 22.5%, 8.5%, and 3.1% on average across the corresponding load ranges. When the engine was operated on CeO2-doped biodiesel, NOx emissions were lower by an average of 25.7%, 9.6%, and 2.5% at low, medium, and high loads, respectively. Adding CeO2 nanoparticles to diesel fuel increased CO emissions, whereas adding them to biodiesel significantly reduced CO emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slavinskas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: