Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis and trial find probiotics partially improve gut microbiome in inactive individuals, suggesting their benefit for modulating metabolic health.
Sedentary behavior is associated with gut microbiota dysbiosis and increased metabolic risk, yet effective microbiome-modulating strategies for individuals who cannot engage in sufficient physical activity remain underexplored. Probiotics may modulate sedentary-associated microbial alterations. We conducted a cross-sectional multi-omics comparison of physically active (PA, n = 65) and physically inactive (PI, n = 90) young adults, followed by a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in the PI cohort (probiotic: PIP, n = 45; placebo: PIC, n = 45). At baseline, PA individuals exhibited higher α-diversity and a more favorable microbial community structure than PI participants, enriched in Bifidobacterium adolescentis, B. bifidum, Anaerostipes hadrus, and associated metabolites. A random forest classifier distinguished PA from PI with high accuracy (96.1%; area under the curve, AUC = 0.993). Following intervention, PIP subjects showed a modest shift toward an active-like microbiome: root Jensen-Shannon similarity between PIP and PA (69.3%) was significantly higher than between PIC and PA (67.8%; P < 0.001), and levels of key taxa (A. hadrus, B. bifidum) and metabolites (vanillic acid, prolylglycine) moved closer to PA. Consistently, classifier performance decreased for PIP vs. PA (AUC 0.690; accuracy 68.2%) but remained higher for PIC vs. PA (AUC 0.843; accuracy 80.0%), indicating a probiotic-associated reduction in microbiome dissimilarity. These findings suggest that probiotic supplementation induces a partial, ecologically measurable shift toward an active-like gut microbiome configuration in inactive individuals, without replicating the full physiological benefits of regular physical activity, highlighting its potential as a scalable, adjunctive strategy for microbiome health in sedentary populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: