Ophthalmologists demonstrate improved detection of convergence insufficiency using AI-derived graphs, highlighting practical applications.
Background: Accurate evaluation of the Near Point of Convergence (NPC) is essential for diagnosing and managing convergence insufficiency (CI). Conventional assessment relies on the patient’s verbal feedback and the examiner’s visual observation, making it subjective and examiner-dependent. The AI-based MobileS platform, previously validated for both diagnosis and home-based therapy of CI, enables smartphone-based measurement and visualisation of NPC through eye tracking, without the need for verbal responses or additional equipment. This study, the third stage of our research programme, examined how ophthalmologists interpret NPC data when presented as videos versus AI-derived graphs. Methods: Twenty-two ophthalmologists completed an online questionnaire with 20 NPC test cases from the validated MobileS database, presented as both silent videos and AI-derived graphs. Accuracy was analysed using mixed-effects logistic regression, and continuous error was assessed using clustered bootstrap. Results: Graph-based interpretation showed higher odds of accurate NPC identification than video-based interpretation at the primary ±5 mm threshold (OR = 19.7, 95% CI: 13.50–28.74; p < 0.0001). Absolute error was lower for graphs than videos (Graphs − Videos: −22.73 mm; 95% CI: −26.88 to −18.59; p < 0.0001). “Uncertain” responses occurred in 28.2% of video-based assessments and 0% of graph-based assessments. Off-target errors decreased from 50.2% (videos) to 3.6% (graphs). Conclusions: AI-derived graphs of eye-movement data were associated with improved NPC estimation, suggesting a potential role in supporting clinical and tele-ophthalmology workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khatib et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: